Alamogordo, NM – January 4, 2026 – A small group of protesters took to the streets of Alamogordo on January 3 to oppose the U.S. military operation that captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, but online reactions to local coverage of the event have revealed far broader community support for the Trump administration’s swift and decisive strike.

The demonstration unfolded during the weekly “Honk and Wave Rally” at the busy intersection of 10th Street and White Sands Boulevard, where approximately 18 or so participants held signs criticizing the operation as an “illegal war” without congressional approval. Local outlet 2nd Life Media Alamogordo Town News documented the event in detail, quoting protesters such as Shari Adkinsson, who declared it “an absolutely illegal war,” and veteran Scott Thompson, who argued the motives primarily benefited “big oil companies.” The report also described a near-violent incident when a motorcyclist swerved dangerously close to the group.

Interview via podcasts with protesters…
https://youtube.com/shorts/cKGAa_x-ErY?feature=shared

Yet when the article was widely shared on Facebook, Nextdoor and in local community groups, the comment sections told a markedly different story

Residents flooded the posts with praise for “Operation Absolute Resolve”—the overnight airstrikes and subsequent capture of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores—celebrating it as a masterful blow against a narco-dictatorship responsible for flooding American streets with fentanyl and destabilizing the region.

Notable comments from shared posts and related discussions include:

• “Finally someone had the guts to do it! Maduro destroyed Venezuela and was killing Americans with his drugs. President Trump just made the world safer.”

• “Zero U.S. casualties, pinpoint precision—our military is the best on Earth. This is leadership we haven’t seen in years.”

• “While a handful protest, the silent majority cheers. Venezuelans are dancing in the streets of Miami waving American flags. That says everything.”

• “These protesters are clueless. This wasn’t ‘war’—it was justice. Thank God for a president who puts America first.”

In a community anchored by Holloman Air Force Base and steeped in military tradition, this digital outpouring reflects a prevailing sentiment that views the operation not as reckless intervention, but as a necessary and overdue enforcement action against a regime long indicted for narco-terrorism.

Nationally, opinions remain more divided along partisan lines, with pre-strike polls showing majority opposition among Democrats and independents, though strong backing from Republicans. Celebrations among Venezuelan-American communities in Florida contrasted sharply with anti-intervention rallies in liberal cities.

Historically, quick, low-casualty operations with clear objectives—such as the 1989 removal of Manuel Noriega in Panama—have sustained public approval far longer than protracted conflicts.

If the Venezuela mission remains limited, avoids mission creep, and delivers tangible reductions in drug flows, it could buck the trend of eroding support seen in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Ultimately, the stark contrast in Alamogordo—between a vocal minority on the sidewalk and an enthusiastic majority online—serves as a microcosm of a deeper national debate.

For many here and across red-state America, addressing threats at their source, even abroad, is not a distraction from domestic priorities like crime, housing costs, and inflation, but an essential part of solving them. By dismantling a key node in the fentanyl pipeline and signaling strength to adversaries, supporters argue, the operation advances border security and public safety in ways that purely domestic measures cannot. 

In the eyes of this military-minded community, January 3, 2026, will be remembered not as the start of another endless war, but as the day America reclaimed its resolve—and Alamogordo stood proudly behind it. Time will tell what the longer term sentiment will be but whatever it is we will be reporting it! 

Source: 2nd Life Media Alamogordo Town News article: “Alamogordo Protesters Join National Outcry Over U.S. Military Operation in Venezuela Without Congressional Approval” (published January 3, 2026; https://2ndlifemediaalamogordo.town.news/g/alamogordo-nm/n/354577/alamogordo-protesters-join-national-outcry-over-us-military-operation). Additional context drawn from national reporting on public reactions, Venezuelan expatriate celebrations, and historical military operations.

More News from Alamogordo

9 responses

  1. Trump is not afraid to make the hard decisions that is what is so great about him, unpopular as his actions are, he makes the call. Apparently the people in Venezuela are rejoicing in the street hailing Trump for getting rid of their dictator and getting their elected leader back in power.

  2. Lorinda R Arella Avatar
    Lorinda R Arella

    Wow. Cannot believe you would be so far off on this, Sir.
    First: Facebook FLOODED with SUPPORT? None of my Facebook contacts had any support for this action whatsoever. Yours is certainly NOT a scientific polling method.
    Second: it is quite possible to hate Maduro — and be proud of our military — and still recognize that our President has no authority to commit acts of war without approval of Congress, hence it WAS ILLEGAL.
    Third: Shame on you for promoting the absolute lie that our Fentanyl problem is coming from Venezuela. Venezuela is involved with Cocaine traffic not Fentanyl.
    Forth: Even if you love everything about the bombing and capture, WHAT gives the US the right to take over another country’s leadership?
    Fifth: Do not speak for the Military’s position on this action. All the military people I know see this exactly for what it was: a chance for Trump and his Oil Buddies to steal Venezuela’s massive oil reserves.

    1. As stated elsewhere. We make no position one way or another for the position of the military or others. Hundreds of comments were posted in favor of the military action and comments were quoted just as we provided coverage of the protestors. We provided coverage of the opposing view. Our position on the action is nuetral. The position of the public from a variety of platforms was the coverage provided. We will continue to be a free speech platform for respectful dialogue no matter ones point of view as protected under the first amendment. Our board of 7 on the review board reviewed and stand by our coverage.

    2. While I share your disgust, the truth is that we live in a city of people who would turn Anne Frank in to ICE. Hearing monsterous people posing as normal people actually said to me yesterday at the protest that Mrs Good got what she deserved.

      They are so delusional in their radicalization of Christian Nationalistic racism that they lie to themselves about what they see. Their perceived view of the political/social stances of another person is legitimate cause to unalive a regular US citizen.

      They cannot understand that when a group of armed men surround your vehicle illegally, they natural response for most people is flight. Regardless of whether than are a right-wing Nat-C, or otherwise.

      Their dear leader gaslit them, and they sucked it down like they always do. Forget your eyes, what is dead leader telling me to think is their mantra.

      Disgusting yes, surprising no? We do not live in a country of laws, we live in a authoritarian fascist regime. I am glad that I have our local humanist group to rely on for support in such a troubling times.

  3. Online posters, maybe even the journalist does not seem to understand that Venezuela is not flooding the country with Fentanyl… they are a transit point for cocaine heading to Europe – not a key node for Fentanyl headed to the US – so not sure how you could even suggest the view point that it will disrupt the flow of it into this country by attacking Venezuela in the article without clarifying. But then, I’m picky about facts.

    1. You have that just a bit backwards. Revenue is going to European globalists. Do some research.

  4. The main point, to me, of this military action is that it was illegally carried out. Whether it should have been done or not is not my concern. Again, the point is that it was illegally carried out and did not have congressional approval.

    1. Please explain what was illegal about it or are you just reflecting leftist opposition. A multitude of former Presidents have taken similar actions. Beware of using the term war or listening to those claiming war. This is not war by any stretch of the imagination. It was an action.

      1. We have never had a leftist President, just typical corporate democrats which are about as useless as the spinless Democrats that helped make Dump our President. If it were not for corporate shill Hillary Clinton being foisted upon the dems as their candidate, Sanders would have mopped the floor with our dear leader in 2016.

        But when it comes to the past, every presidents since Bill Clinton, and likely further have been war criminals. So forget about the lame whataboutisms.

        If you think the Democratis part is left then you have no clue as to what left is. For most of my life the biggest difference between the two major parties in this country have been the color tie they wear, or what buttons they wear on their lapel. You have been duped by both parties, it is an illusion of choice. If there is one good thing to come from our dear leader, it is that he has exposed our system for what a fraud our two party system has been.

        I agree, It is not a war, it is the actions of a bully. Too bad much of the country is unwilling to see the petulant children running the show right now are so incompetent, but this will blow up in our faces in the long run.

Leave a Reply

Translate »

Discover more from New Mexico Conservative News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading